Information on our terms of business
Terms of Business
Our Terms of Business establish the ground-rules for the business relationship between ourselves and our clients. This is a contractual relationship. By understanding, and observing, these Terms of Business, you can help the relationship to be successful. All professional work carried out by us will be in accordance with these terms. You should read these terms together with our Data Privacy Policy for Clients which is an integral part of the basis on which we contract with you.
To download our Terms of Business, our Data Privacy Policy, our Complaints Procedure, or our Conflicts Management policy as pdf documents, please click the links below:
What's happening in IP
See all news06.11.2025
UKIPO refuses registration of "MYSKIN" following opposition by MZ Skin Limited
The UKIPO refused a trade mark application to register MYSKIN after opposition by luxury skincare brand MZ Skin Limited (case O/0728/25, 5 August 2025).
While rejecting the opponent’s argument that there is a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks, the Hearing Officer upheld the opposition under the ground that use of the trade mark MYSKIN would take unfair advantage from MZ SKIN's reputation.
The decisive factor was the applicant’s failure to deny some of the opponent’s claims.
Full story16.09.2025
On 30 April 2025, hot on the heels of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal’s G 1/24, the Hamburg Local Division of the Unified Patent Court issued its own Decision, UPC_CFI_278/2023, on the topic of claim interpretation in view of definitions in patent applications.
Full story21.08.2025
On 28 January 2025, the EPO’s Board of Appeal (BoA) issued Decision T 0070/23, which highlights the limitations of the conclusions of the recent Decision in G1/24.
Full story25.06.2025
Artificial Intelligence
The European Patent Office (EPO) Boards of Appeal (BoA) have issued an important decision addressing the growing intersection of artificial intelligence and patent law. In T 1193/23, decided on April 15, 2025, the Board established crucial precedent regarding the use of AI-generated content. This decision relates specifically to ChatGPT responses used as evidence of how a person skilled in the art would interpret a technical term in a patent claim.
Full storySeen enough?
Enquire online
Thank you.
We will respond to you as quickly as we can.
Contact one of our offices
44 Southampton Buildings, London, WC2A 1AP
Our telephone lines are currently experiencing a fault. Calls to our London office are being diverted to our Liverpool office.
Speak to someone specific
Join our mailing list
Thank you.